Sunday, March 29, 2009
House of Adam: A Disconcerting Insult to Queer Cinematic Aptitude
The most disgusting and depraved element of a horribly awful film I recently had the misfortune to sit through was learning that the film had a theatrical release. Why? Because the film was made for a niche market---those members of the GLBT community that care little to nothing about quality, characterization or any sort of discernible acumen in the depictions of gay people they seek---that's the sort of people films like this are made for. You've seen them---those boys in the gay bars that know more about how Britney Spears shaves her vagina than they do about their own loving mommas. Anyhow, this film happened to be titled House of Adam, written, directed, produced and marketed by the most egotistical film presence since Shyamalamadingdong---his name is Jorge Ameer, and like Candyman, don't say it too many times. To get a sense of exactly what catastrophic elements came together that caused the derivation of this contumely celluloid to be birthed, I watched the director's commentary, which was almost as long as the film. Jorge Ameer, honey, who the hell told you that you had any kind of talent that warranted the making of not only this, but apparently several other films? Now, in 2009, are we still so damn hungry for lukewarm representations of gay men and women that individuals like Jorge Ameer are granted permission to punish us with alarmingly fallacious characterizations of queer? And get a theatrical release? This shit was worse than soft core porn shown on cable. The worst part is reading reviews of the film---you can tell who's desperately gay enough to like this shit--usually based on the fact that there exists a large majority of gay men that assign demarcations of quality based on the attractiveness (and not talent) of the leading eye candy.
What is the plot of this rank piece of sediment that has so sparked my ire? House of Adam is about a wimpy, poorly dressed, closeted dweeb named Adam who lives in a very small town helping an old sick man run his diner. This old man suspects that Adam has developed some sticky fingers recently and calls on his son, Anthony, to catch Adam in the act of pilfering. A disturbingly strange scene ensues where Anthony cuts his finger in the diner's kitchen and Adam, like a baby rooting at a mother's breast, pops the bloody finger in his mouth in what I thought was meant to be a flirtatious manner. The basic, levelheaded audience member (whether gay or not) should, at this point realize that Adam is a creepy headcase and Anthony is about as appealing as a lobotomized mannequin---if someone stuck my bloody finger in their mouth I'd at least voice some kind of reluctance to hang out with that person again. Some things not worth documenting transpire and the two becomes lovers, though of course on the DL. Anthony becomes a policeman overnight, and Adam is suddenly murdered by three religious redneck fanatics that keep popping up. The religious fanatics are also ludicrous, wandering aimlessly around, drinking beer and reading Leviticus right before the cheesy murder sequence which involves roughing up the couch pillows and beating Adam over the head until he's dead with a leather bound Bible. I know it's a blunt instrument, but I doubt a lethal one. Anyhow, Anthony, saddened, wanders the hills of whatever mountain town the lovers lived in like a mutant from The Hills Have Eyes, while the new couple living in the cabin are witness to some extremely lukewarm and uninspired events trying to show that Adam's spirit is haunting the cabin until his killers are held accountable for their actions. From the little I've described, I'm sure you don't have to think too hard to imagine how that plays out. An insult to intelligence and GLBT people everywhere, the pompous Jorge Ameer also casts himself in a cameo appearance as a real estate agent---proving he is as incompetent in front of the camera as he is behind. If ever I get a whiff of Mr. Ameer's taint on a precious piece of celluloid again, I will run away screaming like a special person avoiding electroshock therapy. The DVD case, of course, has those typical no-name critics from WGNTVLV289 or LILACHORROR.COM to champion the greatness of the film, with the front cover having some such critic stating the film is "A Severed Affair." Now what in the fuck does that mean? I know what severed means, but what exactly does that mean in reference to the movie? My review would state "A Hot Steamy Pile." Now that succinctly says something.
To Mr. Jorge Ameer, because I just know you google your name on a daily basis, you hack---You should stop making films. I may not have any influence whatsoever, but your pitiful existence as an appallingly inept filmmaker will be well voiced in any circles I run in and maybe, just maybe, one day gay people (along with having rights) will also demand honest or at least well written depictions of gay people, especially when dished out by gay people. Fuck, at least not as offensively stupid as you make your own out to be.
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Riding In Shuttles With Boys
Bonjour---my poor abandoned readers, alas, I have been off having various octomom adventures with the BF and family and have thus been unable to rant and rave about recent cinematic uprisings, but I am happy to report that I have not been a stranger to the cinema.
Theatrical Releases:
Shuttle (2008) -- The feature directorial debut of Edward Anderson (the screenwriter of that decent Demi Moore/Michael Caine diamond heist thriller, Flawless - 2007) proves to be a decent, if not entirely polished little tale that slowly and effectively reveals itself as the plot evolves. However, I found most of the tension develops because one is forced to watch four able bodied men and women consistently miss out on more than enough chances to escape from a sadistic situation making them all seem, well, like they deserve what they get. The plot revolves around two young women returning to the US from Mexico on a late flight, and the ominous metro shuttle they board with two young men flirtatiously following. The situation quickly becomes intense when all characters realize that the driver of the shuttle (the effectively creepy
Tony Curran, from Red Road - 2006) is going to rob them, and possibly more. While the plot starts off smart and sassy (the driver sneakily convinces the larger of the two young men to help change a tire only to subsequently lose all his fingers on one hand) it's not long before the shoddily written female characterizations float to the top like a bilious, gassy corpse. Our heroine even gets hold of the gun and neglects to shoot her assailant---keep in mind this is after the driver and his partner (a sneakily placed passenger) have already killed the two men---gets a chance to run around in a grocery store and makes the most laughable effort to alert the authorities, and it goes on from there. I don't even have the energy to write out my frustration with the passive females of Shuttle. The cityscape is effectively creepy, (turns out it was Boston) and like a good film noir, even the uncaring city seems determined to swallow the girls alive. However, too many unrealistic elements (there's no cell phone reception in the hood?) weighs heavily on the film, despite an excellent disturbing ending (which I would have cheered at had this ending been tacked on the end of Taken -- 2009). Additionally, as the BF pointed out after the film, there are way too many easier methods of abducting young women for the sex trade (I'm not ruining anything a smart person wouldn't already derive from the film's poster). I realize that this may be to mislead a jaded audience, however, the shit just doesn't add up. To pick up two young women from the airport on a late flight (that suspiciously don't have prearranged transportation) seems like the most difficult way to lure someone into a trap---too many misnomers. Also, you might giggle at a portrait that looks like it was lifted out of W magazine shoot in Pago Pago, but I don't want to ruin the best part of the film. And kitty litter. Gross.
Gomorra (2008) --- I have heard so many raves about this gritty mafia movie that has swept the film festival circuit that I was certain it would flatten under it's own reputation. Which is not to say Gomorra is a bad film. Based on a book by Roberto Saviano that details the exploits of the modern Italian crime scene (apparently the author is still in hiding) the film is, as critics have already pointed out, a stripped down and unromanticized look at the Italian mafia. I do have a fascination with lifting up colossal cobblestones in the gloom and shining a flashlight at the insects and creatures that thrive in the dark recesses of nature---however, my arm would get tired holding the rock up for two hours. This is a bit how I felt about Gomorra---it's so unromanticized that you realize you are indeed watching greasy, awful men do multiple awful things for two hours. That's it. Kaput. I know that we love to cherish Tony Soprano and Coppola's Godfather trilogy--but in reality, that's what these characters are--they foster anarchy, machismo,
prostitution, and degradation from an undeserved parapet of power revolving around an exorbitant amount of money. Doesn't that seem rather irritating when phrased that way? I spent most of Gomorra asking myself why people put up with such bullshit. And the two young numbskulls featured on the film's poster shooting heavy artillery in their underwear? Well, the film does take some time in getting around to the inevitable, to which characters in the film comment on the trouble taken to dispose of two young miscreants the law obviously doesn't concern itself with protecting. A film that may make you thankful to live in a country without the mafia, in the end, is just a little lengthy and a bit random (as it focuses on several different story lines in connection with the mob) for me to completely get into. You can only watch assholes get away with doing bad things for so long before you go to that special place in your head. Like when George Bush was in office for eight years. You feel me?
The Black Balloon (2008) -- A strange and albeit heartwarming film from the Outback starring the eternally beautiful Toni Collette (also pregnant here, as in Towelhead - 2007), The Black Balloon tells the quiet story of the Mollison family. Collette and husband have two grown boys, one of whom happens to be autistic. The film is basically about the trials and travails of family and also accepting and loving those that are mentally challenged around us. The film does have some surprisingly uncomfortable moments that caused some verbal reactions from me, which is getting rare these days. A birthday fight scene is exceptionally well played. I found the weak point of the film to be supermodel Gemma Ward---who is not such a bad actress, just distractingly strange looking. The way Gemma's eyes are positioned on her head make her look like a lamprey, or one of those deep sea creatures who have their own personal light making appendages as they live too deep in the sea to ever see anything remotely known as light. Or in Gemma's case, remotely known as pretty. Yes, I'm being harsh. But sometimes the world makes me shake my head. She's a supermodel. Wow. All in all, a pretty good film. See it for Toni. Directed by Elissa Down.
The Last House on the Left (2009) -- Now, I have always thought Wes Craven was an awful filmmaker whether or not he had the command of a decent budget, so I was not saddened to see this particular remake. As I recently blogged about the original film, I'll cut to the chase. LHOTL is an effective and engaging revenge thriller with some pretty decent acting, a good soundtrack, and excellent cinematography. The rape sequence is particularly graphic and disturbing and the murderous family dynamics were changed to be a bit more realistic. The weakest point, I found, was Monica Potter. Poor, poor Miss Potter--- I want to like her, but she always does something stupid. She was useless in Saw (2004), contemptible in Along Came a Spider (2001), and that leaves her best performance (that I've been witness to) as Patch Adams (1998)---Now that's sad. It might be the point of the director or producers to show that women (or wealthy white women) are unable to inflict, horrible, violent pain on deserving individuals (you know, like the men that raped and brutally beat your only daughter), as Potter's character continually drops the ball in exacting worthy vengeance (I'm not going to lie, I was hoping for a revamp of that famous fellatio torture scene) but thankfully, Tony Goldwyn (the bad guy from Ghost - 1990) makes up for her lack. I'm still curious to see Dennis Iliadis' first film, Hardcore (2004), in which it sounds like the females aren't so afraid to fuck some shit up.
I Love You, Man (2009) -- I'm not sure I have a whole lot to say for this venture. It's neither astounding, nor horrible (if you haven't seen it, go rent Role Models - 2008 if you need a Paul Rudd fix). I kept thinking throughout this film that I felt bad for nice straight guys---it doesn't seem easy trying to find a friend. I will say this, of all the comparable comedies to come out in this same vein (Role Models, The 40 Year Old Virgin, etc), this film was the most gay positive, with Adam Samberg playing Rudd's younger gay brother. And though it's nice to see Jane Curtin looking good, she's in a wasted role here as Rudd's mom. In the end, Rashida Jones didn't seem like a great match for Rudd and their forced chemistry is hurt by the lack of screen time promoting friendship chemistry between the leading men. Nice try for the bromance. Men are so awkward when you try to portray them as having emotions that have nothing to do with sex, or other activities they don't have to be emotional about. Anything else, and they seem, well, gay. Muahhhh!!
Amarcord (1973) -- I am so thankful I had the chance to see this Fellini masterpiece for the first time in the theater. Fellini's last commercially successful film (that also won him Best Foreign Film) Amarcord (or "I Remember") is a bustling picture full of action and energy that stands as a loving homage to Fellini's life growing up in an Italian coastal town in the 1930's. Typical grandiose Fellini at times, the film is hilarious and heartfelt. As a fellow cinema lover, I appreciated the repeated Gary Cooper references, and touches of Norma Shearer and Jean Harlowe. If you like film you can't help but love Fellini, especially when he's in top form. But don't be too tired--there's a lot to take in, especially if you don't speak Italian. The BF said I remind him of Volpina, the mad nymphomaniac, who looks like Amy Poehler in a fright wig. I'm giggling thinking about that wench as I write this.
Now, I know I have been neglecting writing about the DVDs I have been watching. Stay tuned for an open letter meant to humiliate a director I hope you've never heard of named Jorge Ameer and his sad tripe of celluloid, House of Adam (2006). Please, please don't rent it or anything else from this pompous ass of a director/writer/producer/actor/speaker/cinematographer/pretentious/asshole/moron. Just stay tuned for the word.
Friday, March 13, 2009
Treeless Mountain: Of Pride & Prepubesence
Treeless Mountain (2008) -- So Yong Kim's sophomoric effort (which gets its official release in April) has nothing to do with lack of pubic hair, though irritatingly my brain was pickled in testosterone somewhere along the way and it insists on associating this title with lack of pubic hair. I think it's funny. Regardless, I was lucky enough to attend a recent screening of this film and was blown away at how excellent the film was. It made me smile and cry, concerning the exploits of two very young girls in South Korea, Jin & Bin, and their abandonment by their mother, aunt, and an off screen father. The director was in attendance at the screening I was at and peppered throughout the pretentious ignorance of the audience members, the recurring theme of filming with children surfaced several times. One portentous lady exclaimed, "So the girls didn't really know what was going on? You mean, we (the audience) were bringing our own assumptions into what was going on?," to which the cute Ms. Kim slyly shrugged. Yes, film is a manipulation, an art. I don't understand why people get so upset when they realize child actors aren't really all like Dakota Fanning---you generally have to fool children to get the reactions you want---and by the way, no matter how good or bad the actor, there's a whole slew of other people, including the director, that paste together a film. Anyhow, Treeless Mountain is a gripping and beautiful piece of film about two girls, their somewhat abusive aunt, and an eventual return to a somewhat stable existence. Interestingly enough, the film is partially autobiographical. I must make a point to see Kim's first celebrated feature, In Between Days (2006).
Cherry Blossoms (2008) -- Another film that made me an emotional wreck for some reason was German filmmaker Doris Dorrie's new film, Cherry Blossoms. Centering on a long married German couple, Trudi and Rudi, the film opens with Trudi learning that Rudi has a terminal illness. (I didn't quite understand why the physicians insisted on informing his wife and not him, but maybe the German healthcare system is unaware of something we call HIPPA). Anyhow, it turns out that Trudi & Rudi are strangely distant from all three of their children (including a very angry lesbian daughter) and right before packing up to return home from their trip, Trudi unexpectedly dies. Rudi then goes on a touching journey to see Mt. Fuji---turns out Trudi was in love with the Japanese dance art Buto, and out of ignorance and selfishness, made her give up her dream to study it when they married. An interesting and emotional study in loss, love, and what we sacrifice for relationships and children, I cried several times at Cherry Blossoms and was thankful that for me to have children would require Herculean efforts I simply am not interested in exploring. The ungrateful bastards. The actress playing Trudi, Hannelore Elsner, was quite a revelation and I look forward to discovering more of her work, along with director Doris Dorrie.
Watchmen (2009) -- What might stand as the most ridiculous, self-indulgent, ham-fisted, underwhelming, bloated, noxious disappoint of 2009's theatrical releases (for me at least) was this balderdash piece of poppycock I forced myself to sit through this week, causing enough displeasure with cinema that, dear readers, I simply could not bring myself to blog. After my retinas were raped by this harrowing dogmatic drivel, I felt as if I had spiritual diarrhea. This dangerous film had me on the brink of losing hope with humanity, but, my little darlings, I've recovered. My wings still feel clipped but I'm clattering away at the keyboard, feeling a bit like Charly in Flowers For Algernon, however.
Where to begin? Why didn't I like it? Well, it's painfully, insufferably DULL. I discovered this after maybe the 35 minute mark, when I finally gave up on the meandering plot. The more screen time Malin Ackerman (the Silk Spectre) had, the more my blood pressure dipped dangerously low. We could blame the script for blandness, but poor Malin's maligned acting skills when paired with her dull face and plastic personality was the largest crack in the film's foundation, followed swiftly by a dull Patrick Wilson as the Nite Owl, a hammy Jeffrey Dean Morgan as the Comedian, and an atrociously bad Matthew Goode as Ozymandias, the smartest man in the world. Poor Matthew Goode is an example of what the smartest man in the world looks like when written by individuals who are, decidedly, of less than average intelligence or comprehensive reasoning. Not to mention the strange homosexual tensions, (is Matthew Goode supposed to be gay, what with the silk purple everything, Greek laurels and stunningly ugly blonde wig?) and Dr. Manhattan's (Billy Crudup) blue phallus wagging around all over place-- except for the lovely thong he gets to wear in the Vietnam sequences. I guess Napalm would hurt my testicles, too. Perhaps my main problem with EVERYTHING in this film was an extreme lack of clarity---it was pointedly and unforgivably made for die hard fans of the comic series. I wanted some explanations, such as, why is Richard Nixon elected for a THIRD term? I want to know what happened that made it possible for a president to be elected for a 3rd term again. Second, I wanted them to explain what Ozymandias is. I am pretentiously going to declare right now that I guarantee that the core audience of this comic serial doesn't know. (It's the name of a poem by Percy Byshe Shelley). And why, oh why! is Carla Gugino (who's not even forty yet) being made up to play a 67 year old, the original Silk Spectre. Carla has exactly two or three "flashback" sequences. I don't see why they couldn't find a more age appropriate actress if most of her scenes were supposed to be that of a woman nearly 30 years older. The Comedian is also said to be 67 while Rorschach (played by the creepy Jackie Earle Haley) is said to be 35--when for him to look 35 means Rhea Perlman looks 35. And if Gugino is 67 then how old is her daughter? And why this whole overromanticized obsession with Vietnam-Reagan era America that insists on a Baby Boomer certified soundtrack that jarringly wrenches us out of the narrative? Perhaps this time period in America, all those cynical, bitter, insane sociopaths could put on a cloak and become a super hero without any apparent power--but for a generation or two with different fantasies and different dreams, this super hero noir sure misses the mark.
Some awful scenes that made me ball my fists into the theater seat or loudly guffaw:
The repeated sequence of Carla Gugino shouting in a domestic flashback dispute, "I was a super hero goddamnit!"
The flashback sequence where Rorschach's mother screams "I should've had that abortion" when he catches her having relations. --- I laughed long and hard and no one laughed with me. I felt like an asshole and I this was the only satisfaction I was to have during this 3 hour period of time.
The Vietnam sequence where the Comedian spouts some racially charged comments at his knocked up Vietnamese lady friend before shooting her right in the belly. But not before she imploringly says they need to talk (in her broken English).
The "Mars" sequence where Dr. Manhattan has an epiphany claiming Malin Whatsherman is a miracle because she's the product of a sadomasochistic floozy and a woman beater. Mmmhmm. That mean's if Rihanna has a child with Chris Brown, this offspring may also be termed that.
I did not enjoy this film and would gladly donate 3 hours of my life to ensure that director Zach Snyder not get another directing gig. But, as luck would have it, I'm sure he'll be helming a sequel.